<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Czech and Slovak Ophthalmology</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">90</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31348/2018/1/5-4-2018</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Original article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Digital Eye Strain in a Population of Young Subjects</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Veselý</surname>
            <given-names>Petr</given-names>
          </name>
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2195-6349</contrib-id>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Hanák</surname>
            <given-names>Lubomír</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Beneš</surname>
            <given-names>Pavel</given-names>
          </name>
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9430-0383</contrib-id>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
        <day>18</day>
        <month>3</month>
        <year>2019</year>
      </pub-date>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <elocation-id>5</elocation-id>
      <abstract>
        <p>The main goal of our study was to prove short-term objective influence of near addition and relieving prism on accommodative and vergence facility in group of young healthy persons. Further, we wanted to prove objective and subjective difference between two types of soft contact lenses during working with digital device. We had in total 37 subjects in our study. The first group contained 37 subjects with average age 23 years without important eye pathology. The second group contained 8 subjects with the same average age without important eye pathology. In the first group of subjects, we measured binocular accommodative facility (BAF) and binocular vergence facility (BVF) with and without addition 1 D and with and without relieving prism 2 pD BO at working distance 45 cm. In the second group, we evaluated BAF, BVF and standardized questionnaire (Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire – CVS-Q, Sequí M. 2015) during usage of two types of soft contact lenses. The first type of contact lenses (type 1) contained relieving prism for PC working and type 2 was soft contact lens with aspheric design. In the first group of subjects, we measured these values: BAF without addition = 12.78 cpm, BAF with addition = 11.57 cpm, BVF without prism = 12.32 cpm, BVF with prism = 11.59 cpm. In the second group of subjects, we measured with contact lens type 1 these values: BAF = 12.13 cpm, BVF = 13.63 cpm and questionnaire score 9.43 points. With contact lens type 2 we measured BAF = 11.75 cpm, BVF = 11.63 cpm and questionnaire score 12.86 points. We proved statistically important different between two variable only in the first group between BAF with and without addition and BVF with and without relieving prism. In conclusion, we found statistically important decrease in variable BAF and BVF with usage of addition and relieving prism. We found that neither addition nor prism have positive influence on increase of BAF and BVF. Subjects in second group had higher BAF and BVF values with both types of contact lenses in comparison with natural values. We found that with contact lens type 1 (with addition) subjects had higher BAF and BVF values in comparison with contact lens type 2 (aspheric). Subjectswith contact lens type 1 had also lower (better) questionnaire score, i.e. 9.43 versus 12.86 point.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Digital eyestrain syndrome</kwd>
        <kwd>accommodative and vergence facility</kwd>
        <kwd>addition</kwd>
        <kwd>relieving prism.</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="R7922">
        <mixed-citation>Allen, PM., O´Leary, DJ.: Accommodation functions: Co-dependency and relationship to refractive error. Vision Res, 46; 2006: 491-505.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7923">
        <mixed-citation>Rosenfield, M.: Computer vision syndrome: a review of ocular causes and potential treatments. Opthalmic Physiol Opt, 31; 2011: 502-515.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7924">
        <mixed-citation>Rozsíval, P. a kol.: Oční lékařství. Praha: Galén, 2006. 363 s. ISBN 80-7262404-0.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7925">
        <mixed-citation>Seguí del Mar, M., Cabrero-García, J., Crespo, A. et al.: A reliable and valid questionnaire was developer to measure Computer Vision Syndrome at the workplace. J Clin Epidemiol, 2015, doi: 10.1016.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7926">
        <mixed-citation>Smith, G., Cox, JM., Claver, R. et al.: The sperical aberration of the crystalline lens of the human eye. Vision Res, 41; 2001: 235-243.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7927">
        <mixed-citation>Syndrom počítačového vidění (CSV) [online]. Wikipedia, 2017 [cit. 2018-03-21]. Dostupné z: https://cs.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Syndrom_po%C4%8D%C3%ADta%C4%8Dov%C3%A - 9ho_vid%C4%9Bn%C3%AD.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7928">
        <mixed-citation>Tauste, A., Ronda, E., Molina, MJ. et al.: Effect of contact lens use on Computer Vision Syndrome. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 36; 2016: 112-119.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7929">
        <mixed-citation>Tosha, C., Borsting, E., Ridder III, WH. et al.: Accommodation response and visual discomfort. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 29; 2009: 625-633.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7930">
        <mixed-citation>Trusit D. Understanding multifocals and getting them to work. Optician, 249; 2015: 12-17.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7931">
        <mixed-citation>Veselý, P., Spurná, G., Hanák, L. et al.: Poruchy jednoduchého binokulárního vidění u heteroforií a jejich řešení brýlovou korekcí. Cesk Slov Oftalmol, 72; 2016: 223-225.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
