Czech and Slovak Ophthalmology 309 10.31348/2024/5 Original article The Effect of Heterophoria on the Size of Distance and Near Fusion Vergence Veselý Petr https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2195-6349 Beneš Pavel https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9430-0383 Sokolová Šidlová Jana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3841-6541 Záděrová Petra https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3076-615X Došková Hana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1792-9284 1 2 2024 1 3

Aims: To demonstrate changes in distance and near fusional vergence measured with prism bars, while compensating for present heterophoria using current ametropia correction. In addition, to determine the differences in values of the AC/A ratio determined by the heterophoric (calculation) and gradient methods. Material and methods: The basic sample includes 19 subjects with a mean age of 21.5 ±3.0 years (min. 18, max. 27). We used the Von Graefe technique for examination of distance and near phoria, and prism bars for examination of fusion vergences measured in prism diopters. We divided the basic cohort into six research sets according to the size of distance and near heterophoria. This was a cohort of patients with distance (D OR) and near orthophoria (N OR), a cohort of patients with distance (D EX) and near exophoria (N EX) and a set of patients with distance (D ES) and near esophoria (N ES). Results: In the case of both groups with exophoria (distance, near) we found a statistically significant result only for negative fusion vergence (NFV). There was a statistically significant increase in NFV in the sample with distance and near exophoria (D EX, p = 0.01 and B EX, p = 0.02, respectively). In our study, we also demonstrated a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in the values of the AC/A ratio measured by the gradient and heterophoric methods. The values determined by the gradient method are lower (3.0 ±1.1 pD/D versus 5.8 ±0.9 pD/D) than by the heterophoric method. Conclusion: By comparing fusion vergence values in patients with exophoria and orthophoria, we demonstrated that in the presence of distance or near exophoria there is an increase in ipsilateral fusion vergence. In the case of an increase in ipsilateral fusion vergence, the finding was statistically significant both distance and near (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). By contrast, we were unable to prove this fact in the group of patients with esophoria. In our study, we also demonstrated a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in the values of the AC/A ratio measured by the gradient and heterophoric methods. The values determined by the gradient method are lower (3.0 ±1.1 pD/D versus 5.8 ±0.9 pD/D) than by the heterophoric method.

 Heterophoria fusion vergence AC/A Von Graefe method Howell card prism References Wajuihian SO. Prevalence of heterfophoria and its association with near fusional vergence ranges and refractive errors. African Vision and Eye Health. 2018;77(1):420-429. Chetty E, Jackson S, Mitton C, Phillips TK. A review of fixation disparity. S Afr Optom. 2007;66(4):192-197. Babinsky E, Sreenivasan V, Candy TR. Near heterophoria in early childhood. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Jan 29;56(2):1406-1415. Walline JJ, Mutti DO, Zadnik K. Development of phoria in children. Optom Vis Sci. 1998 Aug;75(8):605-610. Saladin JJ. Effects of heterophoria on stereopsis. Optom Vis Sci. 1995 Jul;72(7):487-492. Von Noorden G, Campos E. Binocular vision and ocular motility: Theory and Management of Strabismus. 6th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 2002. Grosvenor T. Primary care optometry. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier; 2007. Zwierko T, Puchalska-Niedbał L, Krzepota J, Mikołaj M, Woźniak J. The effects of sports vision training on binocular vision function in female university athletes. J Human Kinetics. 2015 Dec;49(4):287-296. Scheiman M, Wick B. Clinical Management of Binocular Vision: Heterophoric, Accommodative, and Eye Movement Disorders. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013, p.722. ISBN 9781451175257. Se-Youp L. Comparison of the AC/A Ratio by the Gradient Method and the Heterophoric Method in Normal Subjects. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2000;41(4):1790-1795. Divišová G. Strabismus. 2. vydání. Avicenum, 1990, 306 s. ISBN 9788020100375. Noorden GK. Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility: Theory and management of strabismus. 6th edition. Mosby, 2002. p.657. ISBN 0–323–01129–2. Akpe BA, Dawodu OA, Abadom EG. Prevalence and pattern of strabismus in primary school pupils in Benin City, Nigeria. Nigerian J Ophthalmol. 2014;22(2):38-43. Mathebula SD, Sheni DDD, Oduntan AO. Distribution of heterophoria among primary school children of South Africa. S Afr Optom. 2002;61(2):48-54. Mathebula SD. Investigations of the clinical relationships between accommodation and convergence tests. S Afr Optom. 2003;62(1):21-27. Wajuihian SO. Prevalence of heterophoria and its association with near fusional vergence ranges and refractive errors. Afr Vision Eye Health. 2018;77(1):420-423. Rowe FJ. Fusional vergence measures and their significance in clinical assessment. Strabismus. 2010;18(1):48-57. Alvarez CP, Puell MC, Sánchez-Ramos C, Villena C. Normal values of distance heterophoria and fusional vergence ranges and effects of age. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006 Jul;244(7):821-824. Lanca CC, Rowe FJ. Variability of Fusion Vergence Measurements in Heterophoria. Strabismus. 2016 Jun;24(2):63-69. Radakovič M, Ivetič V, Naumovič N, Čanadanovič V, Stankov B. Heterophoria and fusional convergence and divergence in preschool children. Medicinski Glasnik. 2012; 9(2):293-298. Wajuihian SO, Hansraj R. Vergence anomalies in a sample of high school students in South Africa. J of Optom. 2016; 9(2):246-257. Seguí M, Cabrero-García J, Crespo A, Verdú J, Ronda E. A reliable and valid questionnaire was developed to measure computer vision syndrome at the workplace. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;68(6):662-673.