Ahead of print

Original article

Efficacy and Safety of Micropulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation

Full Text links

Summary

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-CPC) in glaucoma patients and to assess differences among glaucoma subtypes.

Material and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 40 eyes of 35 patients with various types of glaucoma. Micropulse cyclophotocoagulation was indicated for glaucoma which was uncontrolled on maximum medical therapy. The procedures were performed using micropulse mode (2000 mW, 0.5 ms on, 1 ms off, mean energy 129.4 J). Follow-up examinations were conducted at 1 and 3 months and at 6–12 and 12–24 months. Success of treatment was defined as reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) by ≥20%. A subgroup without modification of therapy was analyzed separately.

Results: Success rates were 33.3% at 1 month, 25.0% at 3 months, 35.3% at 6–12 months, and 30.0% at 12–24 months. Higher efficacy was observed in patients without modification of therapy (up to 41.7%). The most stable and sustained outcomes were seen in primary open-angle glaucoma, whereas secondary glaucomas and primary angle-closure glaucoma efficacy was short-term. Additional glaucoma surgery was required in 30% of eyes. No statistically significant change in best corrected visual acuity compared to baseline was observed at any follow-up interval, although a trend toward worsening was observed in the early time intervals.

Conclusion: MP-CPC demonstrates limited and variable efficacy. The outcomes depend on glaucoma type, baseline IOP, and modifications of treatment. The procedure appears relatively safe, although it may have a temporary impact on visual acuity.

References

  1. Allison K, Patel D, Alabi O. Epidemiology of glaucoma: the past, present, and predictions for the future. Cureus. 2020 Nov 24;12(11):e11686.
  2. Sarrafpour S, Saleh D, Ayoub S, Radcliffe NM. Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation: a look at long-term effectiveness and outcomes. Ophthal Glaucoma. 2019;2(3):167-171.
  3. Ling Q, Cai Z, Zhang X, et al. The efficacy and safety of micropulse transscleral laser treatment in glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun 12;23(1):263.
  4. Tan AM, Chockalingam M, Aquino MC, et al. Micropulse transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of refractory glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthal. 2010 Apr;38(3):266-272.
  5. Ma A, Yu SWY, Wong JKW. Micropulse laser for the treatment of glaucoma: a literature review. Surv Ophthal. 2019;64(4):486-497.
  6. European Glaucoma Society. European glaucoma society terminology and guidelines for glaucoma, 5th edition. Br J Ophthal. 2021 Jun;105(Suppl 1):1-169.
  7. Sanchez FG, Peirano-Bonomi JC, Grippo TM. Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation: a hypothesis for the ideal parameters. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthal. 2018;7(3):94-100.
  8. Kotula MA, Paust K, Wirdemann A, et al. Glaucoma treatment by transscleral cyclophotocoagulation using micropulse technology in a low-income setting. Ophthalmologie. 2022 Dec;119(12):1275- 1279.
  9. Williams AL, Moster MR, Rahmatnejad K, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety profile of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2018 May;27(5):445-449.
  10. De Vries VA, Pals J, Poelman HJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation. J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 15;11(12):3447.
  11. Aquino MCD, Barton K, Tan AM, et al. Micropulse versus continuous wave transscleral diode cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma: a randomized exploratory study. Clin Exp Ophthal. 2015 Jan;43(1):40-46.
  12. Preda MA, Karancsi OL, Munteanu M, Stanca HT. Clinical outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma: 18 months follow-up. Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Sep;35(7):1487-1491.
  13. Nutterová E. Our experience with micropulse cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of glaucoma. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2020;76(4):29-36.
  14. Emanuel ME, Grover DS, Fellman RL, et al. Micropulse cyclophotocoagulation: initial results in refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2017 Aug;26(8):726-729.
  15. Lim EJY, Aquino CM, Lun KWX, et al. Efficacy and safety of repeated micropulse transscleral diode cyclophotocoagulation in advanced glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2021 Jul 1;30(7):566-574.
  16. Kaba Q, Somani S, Tam E, Yuen D. The effectiveness and safety of micropulse cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Ophthal Glaucoma. 2020 May;3(3):181-
  17. Lima NV, Lopes NL, Maestrini H, et al. Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation for the management of diverse glaucoma types: a multicenter short-term real-world study. Ophthal Ther. 2026;20:1-12.
  18. Tekeli O, Köse HC. Outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in primary open-angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, and secondary glaucoma. Eur J Ophthal. 2021 May;31(3):1113-1121.
  19. Varikuti VNV, Shah P, Rai O, et al. Outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in eyes with good central vision. J Glaucoma. 2019 Oct;28(10):901-905.
  20. Handa S, Kawaji T, Otsuka S. Short-term outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation using the VITRA 810 and postoperative ciliochoroidal effusion in Japanese patients. J Clin Med. 2025 Oct 22;14(21):7453.
  21. Wijayasiriwardana W, Mukherji S, Logendran M, Mather D. Outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma eyes. J Coll Ophthalmol Sri Lanka. 2022 Jun 30;28(1):17-28.